Perspectives: Federal proposal to restrict noncompetes could have far-reaching effect on employers
On Jan. 5, the Federal Trade Fee proposed a new rule prohibiting companies from imposing noncompetes on their staff. When I very first shared the information on LinkedIn, someone commented, “Yeah, daring transfer FTC …”
And I considered, “Bold shift is wearing seersucker prior to Memorial Working day. This is brain-blowingly enormous!”
In truth, a lot more than 11,000 people today so far have officially commented on the FTC’s internet site on the proposed rule. The remark period of time closes March 20.
However, I don’t have a crystal ball, so I do not know what the ultimate rule will say, permit by yourself whether or not it will hold up to judicial scrutiny.
I will concentration largely on how the FTC’s proposal could have an effect on employers if it is applied as drafted. I’ll also spotlight 1 alternate pending in Congress: the Workforce Mobility Act.
What is the FTC accomplishing?
The FTC’s proposed rule would generally prohibit companies from working with noncompete clauses. Precisely, it would make it unlawful for any employer — no matter of dimension — to enter into or try to enter into a noncompete with a “worker.” Worker suggests a

“natural person” who performs, no matter whether compensated or unpaid, for an employer. This incorporates staff members, impartial contractors, externs, interns, volunteers, apprentices or sole proprietors who supply a support to a customer or shopper.
A worker does not include things like a franchisee in a franchisee-franchisor relationship but does incorporate a purely natural particular person who is effective for the franchisee or franchisor. Noncompete clauses amongst franchisors and franchisees would remain subject matter to federal antitrust regulation and other applicable regulations.
But current noncompetes are safe, appropriate? Incorrect!
An employer that entered into a noncompete clause with a employee right before the compliance date need to rescind it no afterwards than 180 days after the remaining rule’s publication, which will be the compliance date.
The FTC has organized model language for employers to converse the rescission to staff. An employer might also use various language, furnished that the notice communicates to the worker that the noncompete clause is no extended in outcome and may not be enforced from the employee.
By default, the proposed rule does not ban other varieties of work limits, these as nonsolicitation and nondisclosure agreements. Even now, those agreements could be issue to the rule if they are so broad in scope that they perform as noncompetes.
The FTC delivers these illustrations of potentially de facto noncompete clauses:
- 
- A nondisclosure agreement among an employer and a worker that is penned so broadly that it properly precludes the worker from doing work in the identical subject immediately after the summary of the worker’s work with the employer.
- A contractual time period amongst an employer and a worker that calls for the employee to shell out the employer or a 3rd-party entity for training charges if the worker’s work terminates inside of a specified time time period, where the expected payment is not moderately associated to the expenditures the employer incurred for instruction the worker.


Also, the proposed rule will not use to a noncompete clause that is entered into by a man or woman selling a company entity or or else disposing of all of their ownership interest in the organization entity, or by a man or woman who is promoting all or considerably all of a enterprise entity’s operating property, when the human being limited by the noncompete clause is an owner, member, or spouse holding at minimum a 25{a652ac39cb023ff8fd1cc85f4393f5b1bb70bf2f880b7bee35f712e4bd8633f7} possession desire in the small business entity.
A achievable alternative in Congress
Very last month, a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators reintroduced the Workforce Mobility Act to limit the use of noncompete agreements.
In accordance to a assertion by the team, the legislation would:
- 
- Slender the use of noncompete agreements to include things like only necessary cases of a dissolution of a partnership or the sale of a business enterprise.
- Call for businesses to make their personnel informed of the limitation on noncompetes. The monthly bill more authorizes the Division of Labor to do the very same.
- Involve the FTC and the DOL to submit a report to Congress on any enforcement actions taken.



Contrary to the FTC’s proposed rule, the Workforce Mobility Act affords victims a private ideal of motion in federal courtroom to get well real damages and any lawyers costs and costs incurred. No pre-dispute arbitration agreement or pre-dispute joint-motion waiver would implement.
In contrast to the FTC’s proposal, the Workforce Mobility Act would not have an impact on current noncompete agreements. They would continue being intact, issue to point out law governing their enforceability.
How really should companies prepare?
Neither the Workforce Mobility Act nor the FTC’s proposed rule supersedes any state statute, regulation, buy or interpretation that is at minimum as protecting as the proposed rule.
California, North Dakota and Oklahoma now ban noncompetes.
Organizations executing business enterprise in other places really do not have to begin tearing up present noncompete agreements since the FTC proposal is nevertheless a “proposal” and not a ultimate rule. Also, the Workforce Mobility Act has to overcome several hurdles just before crossing President Biden’s desk for signature.
But courts evaluating the enforcement of noncompete agreements typically be expecting them to provide respectable company needs. And, even then, most courts think about the breadth of the settlement each temporally and geographically.
For illustration, the odds are much superior that a court will enforce a six-month noncompete, with a 25-mile radius, against a member of the C-suite than it will a around the globe, three-year noncompete versus a human being whose job is to clean up the C-suite.
Providers should take into consideration ideal alternate options this kind of as nonsolicitation agreements, to guard goodwill with buyers and present staff members, and nondisclosure agreements to defend in opposition to misappropriation of trade strategies and confidential information and facts, which nonetheless enable previous personnel the prospect to make a residing in their decided on profession.
Eric Meyer is a spouse at law business FisherBroyles LLP in Philadelphia. He can be achieved at [email protected].
